I have added the proposed text changes. WG members should review at their earliest convenience. Thanks, Jeff ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: MPI Forum <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [MPI Forum] #401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics To: #401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: jdinan | Owner: jdinan Type: Enhancements to standard | Status: assigned Priority: Not ready / author | Milestone: 2014/12/08 rework | California, USA Version: MPI 3.1 | Resolution: Keywords: RMA | Implementation status: Unnecessary -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Comment (by gropp): The working group would like to see a detailed proposal for each routine. The use of MPI_IN_PLACE should match the style in similar MPI routines. The buffering implications of each option needs to be considered and discussed on a routine-by-routine basis. -- Ticket URL: <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/401#comment:10> MPI Forum <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/> MPI Forum -- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/