Hi Jim,

Meeting in parallel with tools is certainly fine – however, when I asked the WG chairs (in this case Bill and Rajeev), the feeling was that there would not be enough RMA people present for this to make sense.

Martin

________________________________________________________________________

Martin Schulz, schulzm@llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/

CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan@gmail.com>
Reply-To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group <mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 2:31 PM
To: MPI WG Remote Memory Access working group <mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: [mpiwg-rma] WG Meeting in Japan

Hi All,

Should we request working group time at the upcoming meeting? If RMA WG members are available during the Monday tools meeting, we could meet in parallel. Apart from that, the schedule looks pretty packed.

Best,

~Jim.