It's also time to bring MPI_Aint_add() forward for a reading.

 ~Jim.


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Barrett, Brian W <bwbarre@sandia.gov> wrote:
On 10/22/13 8:48 AM, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>Can we approve this in the WG and move for a vote in December?  Seems
>>>like a trivial addition.
>>>
>>>https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/369
>>
>> Unless we changed the rules, I think the best we can do is read in
>> December and vote in March.  We probably couldn't call it an errata
>>item,
>> since its a new feature, not a bug.
>
>Yeah, that sounds more like the procedure we should follow.  I just
>want to get the ball rolling in December.

Yes, we should definitely have a reading ready for December (or figure out
how we want to handle the bunch of small changes Jeff has suggested).

Brian

--
  Brian W. Barrett
  Scalable System Software Group
  Sandia National Laboratories




_______________________________________________
mpiwg-rma mailing list
mpiwg-rma@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma