Hi All,

Let's meet at 10am ET today to discuss the partitioned communication issue Dan mentioned below.

Cross-posting this meeting announcement to both HACC and Persistence WGs as the topic spans both. We'll meet on the teams meeting that is shared between the WGs: https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard/wiki

Cheers,
 ~Jim.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 6:28 AM Holmes, Daniel John <daniel.john.holmes@intel.com> wrote:

Hi Jim,

 

We could look at “completion call before all partitions are marked ready” – see attached email chain or visit the Persistence WG list archive:

https://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-persistence/2023-January/000257.html

 

Agenda:

  1. Confirm agreement of the WG that the answer I gave is the intended canonical semantic
  2. Figure out better wording that states that intent clearly
  3. Assign a lead person who will drive the issue/PR to the March voting meeting

 

This falls between the remits of several WGs: HACC is currently the most active of those with an interest.

 

Best wishes,

Dan

 

From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces@lists.mpi-forum.org> On Behalf Of Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm
Sent: 24 January 2023 21:42
To: Hybrid working group mailing list <mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Cc: Jim Dinan <james.dinan@gmail.com>
Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] HACC WG Meeting

 

Hi All,

 

The HACC WG will meet tomorrow (Wed) at the usual time. Please send any topics for this week's meeting.

 

Cheers,

 ~Jim.