Hi, in conjunction with the process discussion in the hybrid group: Wouldn't it make sense to replace "process" by "MPI process" in the new text on Pages 249-250 ? Hubert ________________________________ From: mpiwg-p2p [[email protected]] on behalf of Jim Dinan [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 9:40 PM To: MPI WG Point To Point Communications working group Subject: [mpiwg-p2p] Info assertions draft Hi All, I have attached an updated draft for the info assertions proposal. The two week deadline is quickly approaching; please send feedback before the end of the week. Thanks, ~Jim. Click here<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/+xpPmuWT7LDWQxILzJ5p9zsHlc6Ch4!k4z!cQRfe9O+ZalWYVqWYWDqNqu3Lw+8K!wQ2sNkfd43jwSwM3UsBbQ==> to report this email as spam.