Plenary on FP16 is a good idea. I do not think we are ready for a reading.

If there is a working group on FP16, I'd like to dial in. I wanted to attend but it's not practical for me to travel in December.

I intend to be at the Portland meeting and we should aspire to do a reading there.

Jeff

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:47 AM, HOLMES Daniel <d.holmes@epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

Hi all,

I need to let Martin know what this WG needs in terms of agenda items.

Will the FP16 proposal be ready for a formal reading at the Dec meeting? I suspect not, because there are still changes being made to the text for a variety of reasons. The announcement deadline for readings is rapidly approaching (7 days from now).

Please vote for one of these options:
1) Formal reading of FP16 proposal
2) Plenary presentation of current status of FP16 and outstanding questions/issues
3) No presentation to the whole Forum

In addition, do we want WG time to progress this proposal?

Cheers,
Dan.
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-p2p mailing list
mpiwg-p2p@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-p2p

Jeff Hammond
jeff.science@gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/