I've made his branch into PR#104:
and linked it to issue#125:
This seems like a straightforward addition. Does anyone want to speak for or against it?
Cheers,
Dan.
—
Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
Applications Consultant in HPC Research
d.holmes@epcc.ed.ac.uk
Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465
Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088
Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT
Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
Applications Consultant in HPC Research
d.holmes@epcc.ed.ac.uk
Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465
Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088
Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT
—
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
—
Begin forwarded message:
From: brandongc <notifications@github.com>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-p2p/p2p-issues] nonblocking sendrecv (#2)
Date: 7 March 2019 at 14:30:36 GMT-5
To: mpiwg-p2p/p2p-issues <p2p-issues@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Dan Holmes <d.holmes@epcc.ed.ac.uk>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Reply-To: mpiwg-p2p/p2p-issues <reply+00c7fc4a534cb053f20f2bf3a7aba650b325aef1914a356d92cf000000011899335c92a169ce18ea9c74@reply.github.com>
I have made a branch "nonblocking-sendrecv" under mpiwg-ptp/mpi-standard
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
