Hi JeffH, You are not currently a member of any chapter committee - you are completely off this particular hook. Part of the review is to examine the Latex/Python to verify that the rendering is correct *for the correct reason*. I think this necessarily involves obtaining the source git branch. +1 for providing detailed instructions, possibly in the form of a Python script. Cheers, Dan. — Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Architect (HPC Research) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465 Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088 Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT — The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. — On 17 Dec 2019, at 18:58, Jeff Hammond via mpiwg-large-counts <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: please attach PDF of spec in any email like this. i do not want to have to do all the git+latex gymnastics for this if i can avoid it. On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:09 AM Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via mpiwg-large-counts <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This is a DRAFT of what I'd like to send to the Forum to get all Chapter Committees to review the document-wide stuff that we need reviewed. Please send comments / suggestions to me. Thanks! (Last week, I accidentally sent this to the wrong WG -- I am [finally] re-sending it to the large count WG for proofing before I sent this out to the entire Forum mailing list / chapter chairs) ----------------------------------------- We need Chapter Committees to review their chapters in 2 sets of upcoming document-wide changes that are slated to be merged "soon". After you complete a review, please put an "X" in the corresponding row/column for your chapter and the specified PR in this Google spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qPAREYgeuSCMtU-EQniDilrHIYb8W0-f6Qzjp-UtnH8/edit?folder=1_LOwR_QeX_bwIe_eptiy0OxWaOvPQ8W8#gid=0>. This will let us track what has been done / what still needs to be done: FIRST SET Bill Gropp (the MPI Standard document Editor) has two PRs with "ticket 0" changes. However, the changes are pervasive and touch a LOT of the document. We therefore need Chapter Committees to review their chapters in the following two PRs: 1a. "Ticket 0 changes for MPI-4.x" https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/145 1b. "Uniform style for Fortran code" https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/151 Deadline: Jan 7, 2020 (Yes, that's an early deadline, but we need time to merge this and fix conflicts with the second set) SECOND SET The Pythonization group has Pythonized the bindings in the entire document. We've completed a first correctness pass over the work, but we need more eyes to compare the end result of our work to (at least) the MPI-3.1 document -- or, better yet, to the head of the mpi-4.x branch. See this wiki page for instructions: https://github.com/mpiwg-large-count/large-count-issues/wiki/pythonizing-ini... Also please see the Pythonization slides presented at the Forum last week<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1QZyh6TbjDMu7mEcNqBFfe9fFOltaCtxgZ2ZODzdtDpI/edit#slide=id.g5d01a902fe_0_69>. Deadline: 21 Jan, 2020 This gives us time to finalize everything before the T-2 week deadline for the Portland Forum meeting. NOTE: At the ABQ Forum meeting, I asked you to commit/PR your approvals.json file that resulted from running the tool. This is no longer necessary -- please just mark the google spreadsheet as described above. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ mpiwg-large-counts mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-large-counts -- Jeff Hammond [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://jeffhammond.github.io/ _______________________________________________ mpiwg-large-counts mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-large-counts