- mpiwg-large-counts - mailman3.cels.anl.gov

MPI Forum Web/Mailing List Migration Update
by Bland, Wesley 06 Sep '16

06 Sep '16

TL;DR - The DNS records for the MPI Forum will be moving from Illinois to Google tonight<http://airmail.calendar/2016-09-06%2019:00:00%20CDT>. This should have user impact, but it’s possible that there will be a short outage depending on your local DNS caches. Other services will be migrating soon. More Details - As part of the overall migration process that I referenced in an email about a month ago, we’re moving the DNS records out of the University of Illinois and up to the cloud (in this case, Google Domains). This should have no impact on your ability to view websites or send emails to these mailing lists, but it’s possible that as the new DNS information propagates to all of the caches around the world, there will be some brief outages. For now, nothing should change. If everything goes well tonight<http://airmail.calendar/2016-09-06%2019:00:00%20CDT>, I hope to start migrating services next week (with the intention of having everything migrated before the 14th<http://airmail.calendar/2016-09-06%2012:00:00%20CDT> so we can make sure everything is stable for EuroMPI and the September MPI Forum meeting. Here is the rough timeline: Sometime this week - Move DNS records from UIUC to Google (hard to predict exactly when this happens) This week - Prepare mailing lists (moving from Indiana to Argonne) and website (website preview available at https://mpi-forum.github.io/) for move. Early next week - Move mailing lists and website to their new hosts September 14th<http://airmail.calendar/2016-09-14%2012:00:00%20CDT> - Migration complete (anything not migrated will be postponed until after the EuroMPI/MPI Forum meeting) If you have questions/concerns about the migration, new website, mailing lists, etc., please let me know. Thanks, Wesley

1 0

Re: [Mpiwg-large-counts] Fwd: github org
by Fab Tillier 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

ftillier From: mpiwg-large-counts [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hammond Sent: Friday, 23 October 2015 6:57 a.m. To: mpiwg-large-counts(a)lists.mpi-forum.org Subject: [Mpiwg-large-counts] Fwd: github org if you would like to be part of https://github.com/mpiwg-large-count<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fgithub.com…>, please send me your github handle. if you do not understand this request, you must not be reading the mpi-forum main email list, in which case, you should not do anything related to mpi forum + github until you are current on this topic. thanks, jeff -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com<mailto:[email protected]> http://jeffhammond.github.io/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffhammond…>

1 0

Re: [Mpiwg-large-counts] Fwd: github org
by Rob Latham 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

roblatham00 On 10/22/2015 12:56 PM, Jeff Hammond wrote: > if you would like to be part of https://github.com/mpiwg-large-count, > please send me your github handle. > > if you do not understand this request, you must not be reading the > mpi-forum main email list, in which case, you should not do anything > related to mpi forum + github until you are current on this topic. > > thanks, > > jeff > > -- > Jeff Hammond > jeff.science(a)gmail.com <mailto:[email protected]> > http://jeffhammond.github.io/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-large-counts mailing list > mpiwg-large-counts(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-large-counts > -- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA

1 0

Fwd: github org
by Jeff Hammond 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

if you would like to be part of https://github.com/mpiwg-large-count, please send me your github handle. if you do not understand this request, you must not be reading the mpi-forum main email list, in which case, you should not do anything related to mpi forum + github until you are current on this topic. thanks, jeff -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Re: [Mpiwg-large-counts] [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda
by Jeff Hammond 17 Nov '14

17 Nov '14

1/2 day is fine. Sorry for the delay... Thanks! Jeff On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote: > Sure, no problem - 1/2 day WG time enough or should be schedule more/less? > > Thanks, > > Martin > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ > CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA > > > > > > On 11/4/14, 8:30 AM, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hi Martin, >> >>I would like to have a large-count WG session or two to discuss the >>following tickets: >>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/34 and >>https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/338 >>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/423 >>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/430 >>- (optionally) https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457 >> >>Background for this request can be found in >>https://github.com/jeffhammond/BigMPI-paper/blob/master/exampi14_resubmiss >>ion_3.pdf?raw=true. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Jeff >> >>On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As >>>usual, I >>> am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until >>> Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed >>>by >>> the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning. >>> >>> For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the >>> experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule, >>>I¹ll >>> put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we¹ll go through them >>>in >>> order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed >>>this >>> scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on >>>the fly >>> due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for >>>enough >>> discussions for the topics that needed them. I¹ll still try to keep >>>track of >>> overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular >>>with >>> the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates >>>the >>> schedule. >>> >>> For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary >>>items >>> as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can >>>start >>> building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets >>> that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated >>>the >>> agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed but >>>please >>> also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for >>>readings or >>> votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24, >>>I.e., >>> the Monday of Thanksgiving week. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________________________________________ >>> Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ >>> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpi-forum mailing list >>> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum >> >> >> >>-- >>Jeff Hammond >>jeff.science(a)gmail.com >>http://jeffhammond.github.io/ > > -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Re: [Mpiwg-large-counts] [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda
by Schulz Martin 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

Sure, no problem - 1/2 day WG time enough or should be schedule more/less? Thanks, Martin ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA On 11/4/14, 8:30 AM, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Martin, > >I would like to have a large-count WG session or two to discuss the >following tickets: >- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/34 and >https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/338 >- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/423 >- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/430 >- (optionally) https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457 > >Background for this request can be found in >https://github.com/jeffhammond/BigMPI-paper/blob/master/exampi14_resubmiss >ion_3.pdf?raw=true. > >Thanks, > >Jeff > >On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As >>usual, I >> am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until >> Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed >>by >> the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning. >> >> For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the >> experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule, >>I¹ll >> put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we¹ll go through them >>in >> order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed >>this >> scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on >>the fly >> due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for >>enough >> discussions for the topics that needed them. I¹ll still try to keep >>track of >> overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular >>with >> the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates >>the >> schedule. >> >> For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary >>items >> as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can >>start >> building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets >> that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated >>the >> agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed but >>please >> also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for >>readings or >> votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24, >>I.e., >> the Monday of Thanksgiving week. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ >> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpi-forum mailing list >> mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum > > > >-- >Jeff Hammond >jeff.science(a)gmail.com >http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

Re: [Mpiwg-large-counts] [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda
by Jeff Hammond 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

Hi Martin, I would like to have a large-count WG session or two to discuss the following tickets: - https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/34 and https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/338 - https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/423 - https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/430 - (optionally) https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457 Background for this request can be found in https://github.com/jeffhammond/BigMPI-paper/blob/master/exampi14_resubmissi…. Thanks, Jeff On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm(a)llnl.gov> wrote: > Hi all, > > I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As usual, I > am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until > Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed by > the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning. > > For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the > experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule, I’ll > put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we’ll go through them in > order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed this > scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on the fly > due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for enough > discussions for the topics that needed them. I’ll still try to keep track of > overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular with > the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates the > schedule. > > For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary items > as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can start > building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets > that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated the > agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed – but please > also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for readings or > votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24, I.e., > the Monday of Thanksgiving week. > > Thanks! > > Martin > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Martin Schulz, schulzm(a)llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ > CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA > > > _______________________________________________ > mpi-forum mailing list > mpi-forum(a)lists.mpi-forum.org > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

BigMPI write-up
by Jeff Hammond 09 Sep '14

09 Sep '14

We have a write-up about BigMPI that might be useful to those in this WG who either missed the plenary I gave in Chicago or do not want to read the entire BigMPI source code (https://github.com/jeffhammond/BigMPI) for details. The paper repo is public on Github (https://github.com/jeffhammond/bigmpi-paper) and you can find a PDF therein - not the one created via "make", mind you, as that would be E-V-I-L :-) This is still a work-in-progress so I very much appreciate feedback on the paper if you take the time to read it. Thanks, Jeff -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0

wiki content created (and list test)
by Jeff Hammond 11 Jun '14

11 Jun '14

Please add yourself to the list of WG members if you want. https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/LargeCountWG This email also serves as a test of the non-emergency WG broadcast system. Best, Jeff -- Jeff Hammond jeff.science(a)gmail.com http://jeffhammond.github.io/

1 0