Hi All, One of the objections last time was that these keys seem like a good idea for performance but there's no implementation/proof. We'll need to collate some of the existing research that shows this gives a performance benefit in order to address that objection. Cheers, Dan. On 20/11/2014 13:03, Jim Dinan wrote:

Hi All,

I would like to bring forward the following ticket on communicator info keys for a formal reading at the upcoming meeting: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461.

This ticket contains the no_any_tag and no_any_source info keys from #381 on which we were able to reach consensus. There are lots of other good ideas on #318, and we will continue to work on moving those ahead.

Please send feedback. The deadline for changes to the proposal is Sunday.

Thanks, ~Jim.

_______________________________________________ mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

-- Dan Holmes Applications Consultant in HPC Research EPCC, The University of Edinburgh James Clerk Maxwell Building The Kings Buildings Peter Guthrie Tait Road Edinburgh EH9 3FD T: +44(0)131 651 3465 E: [email protected] *Please consider the environment before printing this email.* The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.