Re: [Mpi3-hybridpm] INIT/FINALIZE, with corrections suggested by Darius
3 Feb
2012
3 Feb
'12
2:48 p.m.
On 02/03/2012 02:36 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:
As long as we're updating this text, do we want to allow any additional routines before MPI_Init/after MPI_Finalize (e.g. MPI_Wtime)?
Why? The changes made so far are all addressing the limitations that need to be addressed for the endpoints proposal. They are not being made lightly. Adding MPI_WTIME is irrelevant for this. That could be a separate ticket if you like. But there's no reason to mix these two together. -- Pavan -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
5285
Age (days ago)
5285
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Pavan Balaji