Jim, thank you … I will talk to Ryan. Let’s hold July 17 for now and he and I will decide if I can share time on July 3. The unprogrammed weeks we might wish to hold the Next discussion on partition collectives on July 10. And 24. Tony Anthony
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Jim, thank you … I will talk to Ryan.
Let’s hold July 17 for now and he and I will decide if
I can share time on July 3.

The unprogrammed weeks we might wish to hold the 
Next discussion on partition collectives on July 10.
And 24.

Tony 

Anthony Skjellum, PhD
205-807-4968


On Jun 12, 2024, at 6:53 PM, Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:


Hi Tony, Apologies for not catching this sooner. There was no WG meeting today. We moved to biweekly meetings because of reduced activity after the last spec release. Our next meeting is supposed to be next Wednesday; however, it lands on the
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi Tony,

Apologies for not catching this sooner. There was no WG meeting today. We moved to biweekly meetings because of reduced activity after the last spec release. Our next meeting is supposed to be next Wednesday; however, it lands on the Juneteenth holiday and I expect many folks from the US will be off work. The next open meeting is July 17, but your topics might also fit in well with Ryan's on July 3rd if you want to coordinate. Please let me know when you'd like to cover these topics. Full meeting schedule is posted here: https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/wiki

Best,
 ~Jim.

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:32 AM Skjellum, Anthony via mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org> wrote:
Jim, and others, I would like to discuss these topics (frozen proposals from MPI-4 and 4. 1) at the next meeting on June 12: Pbuf_prepare, Parrived_any I would like to see if we can get agreement on these and push into MPI-4. 2 or the next increment
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Jim, and others, I would like to discuss these topics (frozen proposals from MPI-4 and 4.1) at the next meeting on June 12:

Pbuf_prepare, Parrived_any

I would like to see if we can get agreement on these and push into MPI-4.2 or the next increment after that, rather than MPI-5.
I am sure this will take more than one discussion, since we didn't get these through before.  

Note: They are both marked for MPI-5 currently, presumably because we don't have a broad opening for MPI-4.2, and we haven't agreed on an MPI-4.3.


Here are the tickets/issues:






My apologies for long delays in follow up.  We really need to resolve these issues as they impact both point-to-point partitioned and potential collective partitioned comms.

I would encourage additional commentary on the issues; Patrick has made new, relevant observations about the dual roles of Pbuf_prepare recently on ticket#302, for example.

Thank you all,
Tony

PS After that, I really do intend to hold a collective WG meeting to discuss partitioned collective ops 🙂 on June 19, or July 3 or 10, depending
what works in tandem with the Hybrid calendar.


Anthony Skjellum, PhD
Professor of Computer Science
Tennessee Technological University
cell: +1-205-807-4968


_______________________________________________
mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
mpiwg-hybridpm@lists.mpi-forum.org
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm