It seems we had very little, if any, technical opposition on the content of the proposal itself, but mostly comments on the process. I think we need to understand more what are the oppositions. Do we have a list of who voted for and against and their rationale? Aurelien Le 30 mai 2012 à 08:52, Josh Hursey a écrit :

That is unfortunate. A close vote (7 yes to 9 no/abstain). :/

Thanks, Josh

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Thomas Herault <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Le 30 mai 2012 a 01:44, George Bosilca a écrit:

...

The ticket has been voted down. Come back in 6 months, maybe 3.1. The votes were 7 yes, 4 abstains and 5 no.

Thomas

Le 30 mai 2012 à 07:02, Josh Hursey a écrit :

...

How did the vote go for the fault tolerance ticket 323?

-- Josh

-- Joshua Hursey Postdoctoral Research Associate Oak Ridge National Laboratory http://users.nccs.gov/~jjhursey _______________________________________________ mpi3-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft

_______________________________________________ mpi3-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft

-- Joshua Hursey Postdoctoral Research Associate Oak Ridge National Laboratory http://users.nccs.gov/~jjhursey

_______________________________________________ mpi3-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-ft

-- * Dr. Aurélien Bouteiller * Researcher at Innovative Computing Laboratory * University of Tennessee * 1122 Volunteer Boulevard, suite 350 * Knoxville, TN 37996 * 865 974 9375