Thanks Thomas, I’ll send in the changes. Aurelien Le 11 févr. 2014 à 18:40, Thomas Naughton <[email protected]> a écrit :

Hello,

I read through the current proposal and fixed a few minor typos/wording items. I don't have write access to the repo so attached is a diff of the changes from my local copy.

Also, in Example 17.3: - I wasn't exactly sure what side effect the comment before the MPI_Comm_failure_ack() was describing. It might be good to improve that comment for clarity. - Should the "T" variable passed to agree be re-initialized inside the do-while loop?

Otherwise, it looks good to me.

Thanks, --tjn

_________________________________________________________________________ Thomas Naughton [email protected] Research Associate (865) 576-4184

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Aurélien Bouteiller wrote:

...

Dear WG members,

I would like to engage you into provisioning a little bit of proof reading time on monday/tuesday.

We have reached semantic freeze immediately after the december meeting, and we are getting very close to freeze wording too at this point. The current plan is to have all WG edits done by tuesday evening, so that we accept only orthographic edits and comments from external reviewers until the final closure date in a week.

Aurelien

PS: if you do not have access yet to the working repository, kick me an email with your bitbucket ID. It is not planned to update the publicly visible draft before tuesday evening.

_______________________________________________ mpiwg-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-ft <chap_ft_tjn_11feb2014.patch>_______________________________________________ mpiwg-ft mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-ft