Hi Keita, It looks like folks are in favor of canceling today's meeting. Rob -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Teranishi, Keita Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:51 AM To: MPI WG Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Process Control working Group <[email protected]>; Ignacio Laguna <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-ft] [EXTERNAL] Re: FTWG Call Today All, I am having the conflict. It will be great if we can shift the meeting by 30 minutes. Thanks, Keita On 2/14/17, 11:01 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Bland, Wesley" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Discussing them next meeting would be fine. From here on for the next couple of months, I might be a bit spotty. I'll be taking most of March off for our new baby. So if I don't send an email, you're welcome to assume that I'm gone and you can meet without me. :) > On Feb 14, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Ignacio Laguna <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Wesley and all, > > I think it's safe to cancel today's call. > > Regarding my tasks, we do have slides of the Reinit (backward recovery) proposal that I can present at any time. Perhaps we can discuss them in the next call/meeting? I have in my the to-do list to write text about combining the two recovery models (backward and forward recovery), but I haven't made progress on that. > > > -- > Ignacio Laguna > Center for Applied Scientific Computing (CASC) > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > Phone: 925-422-7308, Fax: 925-422-6287 > > On 2/14/17 8:26 AM, Bland, Wesley wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We have the FTWG call scheduled for today. AFAIK, we aren't planning any >> activity at the upcoming meeting. I'll get the non-ULFM issues ready for >> the next meeting that I'll be attending (likely September) and the >> ULFM/ULFM+/Reinit discussions should continue in the meantime. >> >> is there something to discuss today? *I propose cancelling the call* >> since I don't think anyone has made progress that requires a phone call, >> but we can sync up a little bit over email. >> >> ==== >> >> We've been floundering for a while as people have had other deadlines >> and distractions. Looking back at the notes from our last call in >> December, I believe the TODO items are for Aurelien, Ignacio, and myself >> to flesh out the three FT recovery proposals and then see how they would >> interact with each other. >> >> * I believe Aurelien had some ideas about how to overcome some of the >> problems raised at the last meeting. Aurelien, if you could put together >> a slide or two that we could use for the discussion, that would probably >> be helpful. >> * I'm not sure of the status of Ignacio putting together some slides for >> the reinit proposal. If I remember the meeting long ago in San Jose, we >> just looked at a header. It might be nice to have something a little >> more high level to point to. >> * I still need to make the slides for the auto recovery strategy that >> Martin proposed. >> >> Once that's done, we can see where these things interact and how >> difficult it would be to support them together. >> >> Thoughts? >> Wesley >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpiwg-ft mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft >> > _______________________________________________ > mpiwg-ft mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft _______________________________________________ mpiwg-ft mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft _______________________________________________ mpiwg-ft mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-ft