Re: [MPI3 Fortran] Summary of items on the table
28 Apr
2008
28 Apr
'08
3:45 p.m.
On Monday 28 April 2008 13:29, Bill Long wrote:
The problem is that the Fortran standard supports those semantics only for a Fortran pointer, not for a C pointer. I will take the liberty to interpret the standard words "any pointer associated with the dummy shall become associated with the actual" to apply to C pointers as well. Otherwise TYPE(C_PTR) is useless. Of course one can modify the object it points to through the pointer, in C. What else is there? Maybe the standard is not super clear about it, but that's a different issue. I believe the intent has been that the C standard describes that, no need to repeat in the Fortran one. Best, Aleks
6662
Age (days ago)
6662
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Aleksandar Donev