Is TS 29113 changing something in this case?
I.e., does TS 29113 allow LOGICAL dummy arguments in BIND(C) subroutines?
Rolf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres@cisco.com>
To: "<longb@cray.com>" <longb@cray.com>, "MPI-3 Fortran working group" <mpi3-fortran@lists.mpi-forum.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:04:09 PM
Subject: Re: [MPI3 Fortran] [Mpi-comments] MPI 3.0: Fortran 2008 interface - issue with the LOGICAL kind
On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Bill Long <longb@cray.com> wrote:
In particular, the C function is not using _Bool. It would seem to
be more consistent for the Fortran interface to specify the argument
as
INTEGER :: FLAG
or, better
INTEGER(c_int) :: FLAG.
FWIW, the MPI Fortran interfaces have always used LOGICAL for boolean
values, not INTEGER. It would be weird to change them now.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________
mpi3-fortran mailing list
mpi3-fortran@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-fortran
--
Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email
rabenseifner@hlrs.deHigh Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530
University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832
Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . .
www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifnerNobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room 1.307)
_______________________________________________
mpi3-fortran mailing list
mpi3-fortran@lists.mpi-forum.orghttp://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-fortran