Re: [mpiwg-coll] backward communication in neighborhood collectives
Hello, Dan, I am interested in MPI_Neighbor_alltoallv. From its arguments, I do not see one can send a message to a neighbor not specified in the graph created by for example, MPI_Dist_graph_create_adjacent. --Junchao Zhang On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:51 AM, HOLMES Daniel <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Junchao Zhang,
My understanding of the current API for MPI-3.1 is that:
1) the virtual topology does not actually restrict communication via the communicator to the edges specified in the topology - messages can be sent along any edge in either direction, and even between pairs of processes for which no edge was specified.
2) the virtual topology can be specified as a symmetric graph - for every ‘forward’ edge (e.g. from A to B), the ‘backward’ edge (i.e. from B to A) can be included as well.
3) there is already language in the MPI Standard regarding how MPI handles symmetric and non-symmetric graph topologies for neighbourhood collective operations.
Thus, there is no need to create two distributed graph topology communicators to achieve ‘forward and backward communication along the edges’.
Cheers, Dan. — Dr Daniel Holmes PhD Applications Consultant in HPC Research [email protected] Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465 Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088 Address: Room 3415, JCMB, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD — The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. —
On 15 Jul 2018, at 10:42, Anthony Skjellum <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, I just saw this.
We definitely need to consider this concern.
I also need to go review the APIs.
Thanks, Tony
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Junchao Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
I want to try MPI neighborhood collectives. I have a communication graph and want to do both forward and backward communication along the edges. With current APIs, it looks I need to create two comm_dist_graphs. It is a waste since MPI implementations can do similar optimizations for the two. Should MPI support this scenario? Thanks.
--Junchao Zhang
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-coll mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-coll
-- Tony Skjellum, PhD RunTime Computing Solutions, LLC [email protected] direct: +1-205-918-7514 cell: +1-205-807-4968 _______________________________________________ mpiwg-coll mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-coll
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
_______________________________________________ mpiwg-coll mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-coll
participants (1)
-
Junchao Zhang