Re: [Mpi-forum] another request for iaccept
25 Feb
2016
25 Feb
'16
1:56 p.m.
FWIW, I don't think the issue has been a lack of use cases. I think that the issue has been no one has been willing to create a proposal and shepherd it through. Sent from my phone. No type good.
On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Rob Latham <[email protected]> wrote:
Every 3-4 years I come across someone who wants to use a non-blocking accept, and the response is "the forum considered it but did not find a use case". Here's another end-user wishing for an iaccept:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mpi4py/nSy17SavJnI/8EyfKT4-IAAJ
==rob _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
3801
Age (days ago)
3801
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)