Fab: Re:

...

I have to disagree. When I apply updates, I will apply them to the current version of the files. It makes much more sense to write tickets in terms of the most recent golden copy since that is what will be modified.

Is the MPI 3.0 draft a golden copy, or merely silver since it's not complete?

We have called it the golden copy. I have nothing invested in the term so if others want to change it...

...

I do agree that existing tickets should be left as they stand. I also strongly agree that any ticket should clearly reference whatever version it is based on.

I just want to make sure that I don't end up in some procedural BS due to referencing the wrong document. I don't care much which document to reference, and it seems to me to that we should:

1. Reference the latest draft when the ticket is created. 2. Keep the draft reference constant for the life of the ticket.

Does anyone object to these 'rules'?

Your rules more succinctly state my position. Bronis

Thanks, -Fab

...

Bronis

On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:

...

My opinion:

As far as possible, references should be done based on the latest official standard, i.e., currently MPI-2.2.

Only in the case that one wants to modify modified or new text in MPI-3.0 draft 1, one should make references related to this draft.

Best practice is, to always mention the base, e.g.,

MPI-2.2, page 45 line 3-7 reads .... but should read

.... Most opened tickets are besed on MPI-2.2 and should not be modified because this would only enlarge the risk that incorrect page or line numbers are used.

Rolf

----- Original Message -----

...

From: "Fab Tillier" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 7, 2011 7:40:48 PM Subject: [Mpi-forum] Which document to reference when creating new tickets? Hi Folks,

Now that we have a 3.0 draft posted publicly, which document should be referenced when creating tickets? Should tickets still reference page and line numbers from the 2.2 standard, or should they instead reference the 3.0 draft 1 document?

As we create new drafts, will in-progress tickets need to be updated to reference the latest released draft?

Lastly, I think it would be much nicer to have the 3.0 draft available from the MPI Documents section of the website, rather than under the meetings information section (which incidentally includes "for 2010" in the link on the main forum page.)

-Fab

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email [email protected] High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30) _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum