relative to discuss@mpich, devel@mpich is the more appropriate place for this. it is not a discussion most users care about. but i fail to see why it is MPICH-specific. even if the goal is not standardization, i think this should remain within the MPI Forum so that there is no appearance of bias w.r.t. which ABI is the best. jeff On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

"Supalov, Alexander" <[email protected]> writes:

...

I am afraid I cannot comment on particular snippets of other people's email 5-6 year after the events. If you wish, we can get this trail offline and go through the material with you.

No worries. I'm happy to discuss further, though this list probably isn't the best place. Are the interested parties subscribed to [email protected]?

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Jeff Hammond [email protected]