On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:55 PM, George Bosilca <[email protected]> wrote:

It is a sentence inherited from MPI 1, and it made sense in a world dominated by pt2pt.

Sure, I assumed that. :-)

It is very literal and it does not apply “as it” to all concepts in the __current__ standard, but the intent is remain clear: prevent any form of unexpected messages.

I understand that it is desirable to be vague in some places. But this is not a case of being vague: it's a case of being *wrong*. And it should therefore be fixed. -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/