Re: [Mpi-forum] Changelog question
Rolf -- How's this? (see attached; the rendered text didn't copy-n-paste well into a plain-text email) I honestly don't have too much of an opinion here -- Fab and I put together what we think Rolf wanted, but it *does* seem like a little overkill. The only think I have a slight reservation about is that this sets a high bar for all other MPI-3 proposals -- e.g., will the one-sided chapter need to have changelog entries for every new function (because they're interleaved; it's not like NBC or MPI_T that just added whole new sections). Or should we have a single new changelog entry, perhaps with a table or list of all the new functions? (I see that Rolf made 13 new changelog entries for the Fortran 08 stuff -- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/raw-attachment/ticket/229/mpi-r...) On Apr 21, 2011, at 7:15 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:
Yes, of course, but I thought that the MPI_Count ticket has only about 6 new routines, similar to the two entries 17 and 18 on MPI-2.2 pages 594 and 595 about the MPI_DIST_GRAPH_... routines.
If a whole new main chapter is added, then typically only one ticket is added, without mentioning 20 routines.
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
participants (1)
-
Jeff Squyres