RMA WG Vote Announcements
Dear all, The RMA WG would like to request the following votes: No-no-vote and subsequent 1st vote: *RMA accumulate operations don't distinguish between throughput and latency sensitive applications* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/640 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/640 Changes from the March meeting: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/749/commits/82ab18050ce969750... Second votes: *Example 12.4: RMA communication calls may not block in PSCW* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/555 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/671 *Make all RMA communication procedures local* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/653 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/769 *RMA: Examples 12.4 and 12.5 contain advice to implementors* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/652 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/768 No-no-vote with subsequent second vote: *Allow MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY on created and allocated windows* Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/23 PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/708 Changes since March reading: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/708/commits/9a62a36f4cb3c9300... Thanks Joseph
participants (1)
-
Joseph Schuchart