Re: [Mpi-forum] Indices
Dear chapter authors of Coll, inqiry, binding, appLang, I fixed it. svn r1486. Here the list: Function index - lower case letters: ==================================== Unintended: ----------- chap-coll - Text in Section 5.13, Examples 5.29 - 5.33 DONE: \cfunc + \mpifuncindex or simply make upper case MPI_Bcast, 218 MPI_Ibarrier, 218 MPI_Recv, 219 MPI_Send, 219 MPI_Wait, 219 MPI_Waitall, 220 chap-inquiry - Text in Section 8.7, Examples 8.7 + 8.9 DONE: \cfunc + \mpifuncindex or simply make upper case MPI_Cancel, 360 MPI_Finalize, 360 chap-binding / Fortran - Text in Section 17.1.12 DONE: mpifunc --> const MPI_Request, 628 chap-appLang - A.1.3 - Subsection on mpi_f08 callback prototypes DONE: \ffunc + \mpifuncindex or simply make upper case MPI_Comm_create_keyval, 680 MPI_Op_create, 680 MPI_Win_create_keyval, 680 MPI_Comm_create_errhandler, 681 MPI_File_create_errhandler, 681 MPI_Grequest_start, 681 MPI_Type_create_keyval, 681 MPI_Win_create_errhandler, 681 MPI_Register_datarep, 682 Intended (therefore unchanged, as we had in MPI-2.1 and 2.2): --------- mpiexec, 358, 362, 364, 364, 488 mpirun, 363, 364 Best regards Rolf ----- Original Message -----
From: "William Gropp" <[email protected]> To: "Main MPI Forum mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:21:15 PM Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] Indices Yes, these need to be fixed.
Mixed case in the function index means either the C binding name (or Fortran08 name) was used where the language-independent name should be used, or \func or \mpifunc were used for a language-binding-specific name (which is incorrect macro usage). Chapter authors need to fix this. There as also some non-functions in the function index; those must be fixed.
Example index entries need to be checked; I added a bunch to context as many examples were missing the index entries (made with \exindex).
I think it is ok for removed and deprecated names to show up in the index.
Bill
William Gropp Director, Parallel Computing Institute Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
Hi All,
After reviewing the indices, I found a few issues:
- MPI_Type_struct and MPI_TYPE_EXTENT show up in the example indices. This should not happen as they are removed. - I'm not sure if removed and deprecated routines should show up in the Function Index, but right now, they do. - similarly in the MPI Callback Function Prototype Index - similarly in Constant and Predefined Handle Index - in the function index, many routines show up twice (caps and no caps) and some show up only with no caps.. All should be caps (I think).
Do the chapter authors need to fix those in their chapters?
Thanks, Mohamad _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
-- Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email [email protected] High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone ++49(0)711/685-65530 University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 / 685-65832 Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . . www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . (Office: Allmandring 30)
participants (1)
-
Rolf Rabenseifner