As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI. Do the other implementations want this information included ? How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ? Thanks, Rich -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Graham Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question Feel free to add these to the list of your responses. Rich -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question Below is the list for MPICH -- On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote:

- Nonblocking collectives - MPI Tool Interface - Distributed Graph - Noncollective communicator creation

Already supported.

- RMA enhancements - New Fortran bindings - Sparse collectives - Enhanced Datatype support

November 2012. What about the remaining features that are voted in? - hindexed_block - const bindings - matched probe - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags - comm_split_type For MPICH, these are all already supported. -- Pavan -- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum