Hybrid WG already had all the interested parties and was active. I don't recall p2p WG was particularly active when discussion of 381 started ~2 years ago. As always, every member of the forum can participate in any WG and 381/461 were always discussed in the open for anyone to see. As it currently stands, p2p WG has more than enough to discuss without this ticket. Note also that some of the info keys discussed have a greater impact when threads are involved, hence are connected to hybrid. Jeff Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Richard Graham <[email protected]> wrote:

Why is such a proposal coming out of the hybrid working group ? This is more appropriate for the point-to-point working group. Not that it is that critical what the group name is, but more to get feedback from a wide range of folks interested is such topics.

Rich

From: mpi-forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Dinan Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 8:58 AM To: Main MPI Forum mailing list Subject: [Mpi-forum] Info Keys Ticket

Hi All,

The hybrid working group would like to put forward ticket #461 (https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/461) for consideration for MPI 3.1, with a formal reading at the upcoming December meeting.

This ticket proposes the no_any_tag and no_any_source info keys, on which we have achieved consensus. We continue to have vigorous and productive debate on additional communicator info keys proposals that have been captured in #381. We will pursue these additional proposals for MPI 4.0.

Thanks and see you in December, ~Jim.

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum