I prefer Chicago and CA as well. I didn't go to the Atlanta meeting, but I see no reason to have a meeting there. -- Pavan On 07/08/2010 10:04 AM, Darius Buntinas wrote:

...and the Chicago and CA meeting facilities were free IIRC. Also, while the wireless may have been flaky at times in Chicago and CA, but it's better than no wireless at all in ATL.

I prefer Chicago or CA over ATL, but I'd still go if it were in ATL.

-d

On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Dave Goodell wrote:

...

On Jul 8, 2010, at 5:37 AM CDT, Graham, Richard L. wrote:

...

At this stage I will keep that meeting in Atlanta, unless more people speak up. The CA and Chicago venues that we normally use are better than the ATL hotel we had last time. I would prefer not meeting in Atlanta unless we can be sure it will work as well as the other two locations.

-Dave

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Pavan Balaji http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji