Re: [Mpi-forum] another request for iaccept
25 Feb
2016
25 Feb
'16
2:40 p.m.
On Feb 25, 2016, at 2:01 PM, William Gropp <[email protected]> wrote:
Part of that proposal must explain why using Accept in a separate thread (as suggested by this very post) isn’t sufficient.
Is it different than the rationale for other non-blocking MPI operations? -- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
3801
Age (days ago)
3801
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)