Hi Jeff, Sure, no problem - I marked the second slot as a joint WG session. As for the WG itself, I have no problems with the plan unless Fab objects. I’ll wait to make any changes there until we hear from him. Thanks, Martin ________________________________________________________________________ Martin Schulz, [email protected], http://scalability.llnl.gov/ CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA On 11/22/14, 6:02 PM, "Jeff Hammond" <[email protected]> wrote:

Martin:

Can you assign one of the two slots for the large-count WG on Monday to be a joint meeting with the greq WG? Again, this assumes Fab will not veto this plan...

One of my main motivations for better greqs is large-count nonblocking collectives, so it makes sense to me to combine the discussion. The other motivation for this at the San Jose meeting is that there's not time for a separate greq WG session since I'm otherwise obligated on Tuesday and it seems imprudent to overlap with WGs that Pavan is driving since he has expressed interest.

Thanks!

Jeff

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jeff Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Ok. Fab is currently the greq WG lead and I understand he's not going to be absent from the Forum for a while (not immediately).

Martin: Can you assign Pavan and/or me as the WG lead, assuming Fab consents to it?

Thanks,

Jeff

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Balaji, Pavan <[email protected]> wrote:

...

It might make more sense to revive the generalized requests WG. I'm very interested in helping drive the extended generalized requests proposal, whichever WG it ends up being in.

-- Pavan

...

On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Jeff Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:

I guess there is an inactive WG for generalized requests, but perhaps it makes more sense to discuss in the context of the active p2p or hybrid WG.

Does anyone have any comments on this?

The relevant ticket is https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457.

My motivation for revisiting this issue is that I've found a number of problems that can be addressed with MPICH-style generalized requests, including large-count nonblocking collectives.

Thanks,

Jeff

-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/ _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Pavan Balaji ✉️ http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/

-- Jeff Hammond [email protected] http://jeffhammond.github.io/ _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum