Fair enough. Can we change the agenda to call it an overflow slot? I say this because I'm guessing we'll get the same question multiple times when people start looking at the agenda in detail. :-) On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:

Not intentional, but decided to leave it there for spill over, as we already have a very full agenda ...

Rich

On Jan 6, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:

...

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:

...

I see that ICOMM_DUP (#168) is on the agenda twice: Tue and Wed afternoons.

Is that intentional? Hmm, not from my perspective, I was planning on using the Tue slot only (I didn't realize there was a Wed slot :-). Maybe that could accommodate Adam's Info stuff?

Torsten

-- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ ----- Torsten Hoefler | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC) 1205 W Clark Street | Urbana, IL, 61801 NCSA Building | +01 (217) 244-7736 _______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

_______________________________________________ mpi-forum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/