Hi Rich,

 

Thanks. Great to see this document come together. Two questions:

 

1.       I suppose we should keep this draft to ourselves for the time being, so I’m asking how strict this should be. I would rather involve some people on my team to review this or a later draft if this is not explicitly disallowed.

2.       In case we do find something that appears to be incorrect, what is the right process to report the issue? I.e., ii/6 mentions C++ interface that has been removed AFAIK, and the rest of the text still contains the resp. C++ calls and such. Is this an issue, and if so, who will deal with it?

 

Best regards.

 

Alexander

 

 

Here is a version that people can start to look at – as was mentioned, updates are still coming.

 

Rich