The University of Illinois supports this.

Bill

On Aug 8, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Adam Moody wrote:

Hello all,
I'd like to propose a new Miscellaneous working group as a placeholder
for ideas which don't nicely fit into any of the existing working
groups.  At the moment, here are the topics I'd like to include in such
a group.

* Recommending standard names and options for MPI compiler wrappers, in
the same way the 2.0 makes recommendations about mpiexec
* Assembling test suites for 2.2 and 3.0, perhaps not blessed by the
standard, but a place where all MPI developers can download and/or
contribute tests to check their MPI meets the spec (or rather doesn't
fail to meet the spec for some particular test case)
* Organizing a survey to identify features that users currently use in
MPI, and for feedback on new features proposed for 3.0
* Recommending standard tools interfaces, like MPIR_PROCDESC

I'm willing to chair this group.  Are there other organizations who
would support it?
-Adam Moody
LLNL
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

William Gropp
Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign