That sounds good to me. I just didn't see that in the slides until one of the corner cases.

Thanks,
Wesley


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Pavan Balaji <balaji@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

That's one of the proposed changes.


On 08/26/2013 01:06 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
Am I mistaken in remembering that MPI doesn't allow an application to go
in and out of MPI:

INIT
....
FINALIZE
....
INIT
....
FINALIZE

I've looked at the standard and that's what Section 8.7 says to me. So
am I correct in assuming that this will change that text to say that you
can start, stop, and start new "MPI epochs"?

Thanks,
Wesley


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
<jsquyres@cisco.com <mailto:jsquyres@cisco.com>> wrote:

    The hybrid working group will be hosting a plenary on Friday
    afternoon in Madrid.

    We will be presenting a proposal on MPI_INIT/MPI_FINALIZE regarding
    interaction with threads (going back to the use cases Jeff Hammond
    raised at a prior Forum meeting), and nested MPI_INIT/MPI_FINALIZE.
      This is not a formal reading; we're requesting Forum feedback on
    the overall ideas.

    The slides are attached.  See you in Madrid.

    --
    Jeff Squyres
    jsquyres@cisco.com <mailto:jsquyres@cisco.com>

    For corporate legal information go to:
    http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

    _______________________________________________
    mpi-forum mailing list
    mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org <mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org>
    http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum





_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum


--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji