I&#39;m not sure I see what you&#39;re saying. It&#39;s advice to users and it specifically says that it won&#39;t call the errhandler when success or pending. <span></span><br><br>On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, MPI Forum &lt;<a href="mailto:mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org">mpi-forum@lists.mpi-forum.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">#472: Clarify behavior of multiple error handlers in a single call<br>
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------<br>
Reporter:  wbland                    |                  Owner:  wbland<br>
    Type:  Text (only) changes       |                 Status:  new<br>
Priority:  Forum feedback requested  |              Milestone:  2015/03/02<br>
 Version:  MPI 4.0                   |  Portland, USA<br>
Keywords:                            |             Resolution:<br>
                                     |  Implementation status:  Unnecessary<br>
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Comment (by bouteill):<br>
<br>
 About ERR_PENDING: should it be an advice to implementors, or should it be<br>
 normative text ?<br>
<br>
--<br>
Ticket URL: &lt;<a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/472#comment:2" target="_blank">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/472#comment:2</a>&gt;<br>
MPI Forum &lt;<a href="https://svn.mpi-forum.org/" target="_blank">https://svn.mpi-forum.org/</a>&gt;<br>
MPI Forum<br>
</blockquote>