Hi all,

I’d like to announce a (re-)reading for the upcoming Mar’23 meeting.

Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/639

PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750

Changes since last reading (basically a complete re-write of the affected sentence): https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/750/files/78353ac06a93a01db2d5afa3fe99d7d034983a2e..ea435a915436313033430b2e8da219675947bb65

PDF (with highlights, p68): https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/files/10785518/mpi41-report_Issue639_MPI_WAIT-is-nonlocal-except-when-it-isnt_79762fb1.pdf

I would also like to request a 2^nd vote for the following issues that have passed a 1^st vote:

Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/188

PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/203

Summary: state that Example 3.10 is unsafe

Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/83

PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/666

Summary: new Info key for strict start order of persistent collective operations

Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/472

PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/606

Summary: disambiguate “rank” in the point-to-point chapter

Issue: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/117

PR: https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/748

Summary: “logically concurrent” might not be – advice

All these are unchanged since their 1^st vote state.

Best wishes,

Dan.