I have updated all of my tickets; I tried to pick reviewers who care about the particular topic, either because they commented on it, argued about it in Chicago, or otherwise are familiar with the topic. If I couldn't find names that fit any of those criteria, I tried to "spread the wealth" and pick random Forum attendee names. Sorry (but some of my tickets are trivial text changes; it shouldn't take you long to review). :-) I also updated most of my tickets to the "waiting for reviews" status (some already had their first reading, because the "need 4 reviews" rule came in after they had their 1st reading already), so you can easily see what tickets are waiting. Thanks. On Dec 5, 2008, at 10:00 AM, William Gropp wrote:

Our next MPI 2.2 discussion is in just over a week, and we have a lot to do. Please have a look at the wiki for the following (see https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/report for the reports):

1) For your own tickets, make sure that they are up to date. If reviewers are needed, please contact them and encourage them to submit their reviews. If revised text is needed, please update the text and if you would like early feedback, notify this list.

2) For items on which you are a reviewer (particularly MPI 2.1 chapter authors), please review the relevant tickets. When you are reviewing text, make sure that you are looking at the current MPI 2.1 standard; check page and line numbers as well as the context to ensure that the change is correct.

3) For other tickets, review them and raise any issues that you have *now* so that we can start the discussion before our meeting.

Thanks!

Bill

William Gropp Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

_______________________________________________ mpi-22 mailing list mpi-22_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22

-- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems