Re: [Mpi-22] SVN committing MPI-2.2 latex
I would like the author check boxes in addition to the new states; that makes it easier to keep track of who needs to be poked :) And FWIW, I'd also prefer to have a single data source, but I need one that will give me a quick overview of the state of the world (and would do so without giving me constant tracebacks). There's still info in my spreadsheet that isn't easily extracted from Trac. Bill On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 13, 2009, at 3:53 PM, William Gropp wrote:
I prefer 2 (check boxes for each chapter author); the diagram is fine. I'm keeping a separate spreadsheet because it takes a *lot* less time to access the overall data that way.
I'm confused. I added the new states ("waiting for PDF reviews" / "ticket complete") and renamed the other two ("waiting for proposal reviews" / "proposal reviewed"), but do you want me to add the author checkboxes or not?
FWIW: I think it'll be confusing if two different data systems are used to track the tickets (trac + a spreadsheet).
-- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________ mpi-22 mailing list mpi-22_at_[hidden] http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-22
William Gropp Deputy Director for Research Institute for Advanced Computing Applications and Technologies Paul and Cynthia Saylor Professor of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
participants (1)
-
unknown@example.com