Re: [Mpi-22] New proposal: Support for large message counts
Are there systems today that use a 128 bit long long? Are there virtual memory systems or filesystems coming in the reasonable future that use a 128 bit address range? On IBM Power we support both 32 bit and 64 bit executables. For both 32 bit and 64 bit executables, the C compilers treat int as 32 bits and long long as 64 bit. C long differs so is 32 bits in a 32 bit executable and 64 bits in a 64 bit executable (I.E. big enough to hold an address/pointer). The jump from 32 bits to 64 bits is a factor of 4 billion so it may be goodness in the abstract to think about what comes after 64 bits gives way to 128 bits, should we consider this a real problem? I do not see much reason to worry about the fact that multiplying 2 arbitrary 64 bit values can overflow a 64 bit result unless we think some real situation will call for 128 bit results. Dick Treumann - MPI Team IBM Systems & Technology Group Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363 Alexander wrote <snip>
Another thing is that if we multiply to long values, the result may potentially overflow a long. So, for a library that allows long counts and long datatype extents, the internals of the library will have to be long long. long long (128 bit) arithmetic may be rather expensive on some CPUs. So, the 64-bit interface should probably be optional. <snip>
*
participants (1)
-
unknown@example.com