On Jun 4, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Rob Latham <[email protected]> wrote:

On 06/04/2015 02:26 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:

...

Although I've not tested, this fix should be enough:

That's a good fix. My only concern is if we hit the limit not because it is too small, but because something is going wrong.

I would also be a bit concerned about that.

Hey, we doubled the value back in 2008. Maybe we just double it every 6.5 years and we're fine for a few decades.

A linked-list-based stack of malloc-ed nodes is a pretty easy fix for this too, instead of having some arbitrarily sized array. But that's assuming that Rob's earlier concern is not actually an issue. -Dave