Re: [mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?
18 Oct
2013
18 Oct
'13
3:19 p.m.
More tests is more better. A test in hand is worth two in the bush. :) ~Jim. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Latham <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Jim Dinan wrote:
(Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the branch in question, so please ignore if redundant) It would be good to commit the test case too, if you haven't already added it.
I added large_type to the test suite a while back. It constructs a type not unlike what Jeff describes.
The mere act of committing some of those types makes MPICH blow up, so I don't really know how my feature branch can make things worse than that! :>
==rob
-- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA
4661
Age (days ago)
4661
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Jim Dinan