Re: [mpich-devel] [PATCH] ofi: need to specify ordering for FI_EP_RDM
It's the work of 30 seconds, so I'll just resubmit without the signoff and whitespace changes. You can use my re-submission, or if you've done it locally already, cool.
On Sep 4, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sep 4, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Kenneth Raffenetti <[email protected]> wrote:
This patch looks correct. I'm just running it through our Jenkins to sanity check it. A few minor issues.
1. I'd like to omit the whitespace modifications so it's clear that it's just the 2 lines that were added for this change.
Sure, no problem. I did it because everything was lined up; it looked like someone did that on purpose, so I just maintained it.
Would you like me to re-submit without the whitespace change? I'm happy to do so.
2. Our project uses "Signed-off-by" as an indication of code review. While we are aware this is contrary to how most git projects work, this is the current situation. For consistency, I would remove your signoff and add my own to indicate I reviewed the patch before pushing to master. Does that sound okay?
No problem from me. If you'd like me to re-submit for the whitespace stuff, I can remove my signoff.
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
-- Jeff Squyres [email protected] For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
participants (1)
-
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)