It's not really in MPICH test format so I have to modify it before commit. And it sounds like Rob did something similar enough already. Jeff ----- Jim Dinan <[email protected]> wrote:

All I'm suggesting is that you guys commit the test case that you just ran, like 5 emails ago.

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Jeff Hammond <[email protected]> wrote:

...

We look forward to your patch :-)

jeff

----- Original Message -----

...

From: "Jim Dinan" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:19:32 PM Subject: Re: [mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?

More tests is more better.

A test in hand is worth two in the bush.

:)

~Jim.

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Latham < [email protected] > wrote:

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Jim Dinan wrote:

...

(Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the branch in question, so please ignore if redundant) It would be good to commit the test case too, if you haven't already added it.

I added large_type to the test suite a while back. It constructs a type not unlike what Jeff describes.

The mere act of committing some of those types makes MPICH blow up, so I don't really know how my feature branch can make things worse than that! :>

==rob

-- Rob Latham Mathematics and Computer Science Division Argonne National Lab, IL USA

-- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute [email protected] / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond ALCF docs: http://www.alcf.anl.gov/user-guides

-- Jeff Hammond Argonne Leadership Computing Facility University of Chicago Computation Institute [email protected] / (630) 252-5381 http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond ALCF docs: http://www.alcf.anl.gov/user-guides