Most of these projects never requested a FY16 allocation but were granted a 50k startup in FY15. For those that didn't request FY16, should I just put their FY15 initial request as the FY16 request?


From: <allocations-admins-bounces@lcrc.anl.gov> on behalf of John Blaas <wilshire@mcs.anl.gov>
Reply-To: LCRC Allocations Admins <allocations-admins@lcrc.anl.gov>
Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM
To: LCRC Allocations Admins <allocations-admins@lcrc.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [allocations-admins] 15 more new projects

Going to grant all of the following projects with 50k initial
allocation tomorrow morning if no one has any comments.

The following projects are:

CataAgCl
CCCTMO
CoC_tersoff
Comp_POP_Catalysts
FF-opt
HEHV_modeling
iro-catal
IVwire
Lanthanide_FF
Li-air_phase
Li-S_Trans
Meso_Nuclear
PhotoCu2O
polarons
PrtnAdp_CG
Superlubricity_ND_2D
VO2_thermal
WEST

Waiting off on BrewerDefectForm since the proposal made it sound like
this was the proprietary project from Brewer, unless things have been
worked out with legal of course to give this project the greenlight?

Thanks,
JB


On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Bair, Raymond A. <rbair@anl.gov> wrote:
We suddenly have 15 requests for new projects this week, all requesting
time in Q4.

Earlier in the month we capped new requests at 100K.  That should be less
now, perhaps 75K or 50K?

Also, each of these 15 will need to be reminded to turn in a FY16 request
too.  I suppose they need to wait until their FY15 time is approved, so
time is if the essence.

Ray

_______________________________________________
allocations-admins mailing list
_______________________________________________
allocations-admins mailing list
allocations-admins@lcrc.anl.gov
https://lists.lcrc.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/allocations-admins